#181
|
||||
|
||||
Re: What Are Your Predictions for City Harvest Case? Guilty or Not?
Quote:
__________________
How can you protect Singapore when you can't protect your own military hardware ? Many thanks to 70% who voted for them . |
#182
|
|||
|
|||
True that. He was just 300m away from Malaysian soil... take sampan for fuck meh, swim over lah.
|
#183
|
||||
|
||||
Re: What Are Your Predictions for City Harvest Case? Guilty or Not?
Probably he doesn't know how to swim ?
__________________
How can you protect Singapore when you can't protect your own military hardware ? Many thanks to 70% who voted for them . |
#184
|
||||
|
||||
Re: What Are Your Predictions for City Harvest Case? Guilty or Not?
Elder brother of Chew Eng Han released on police bail
Published 22 February, 2018 Updated 26 February, 2018 SINGAPORE — Mr Chew Eng Soon, the elder brother of convicted City Harvest Church (CHC) leader Chew Eng Han, has been released on police bail after he was arrested earlier this week in connection with his sibling's attempt to flee Singapore illegally. The elder Mr Chew, 61, could not be detained for more than 48 hours without being charged in court, the police said on Friday (Feb 23). He was arrested at about 3.40pm on Wednesday, a few hours after his 57-year-old brother was caught by the Police Coast Guard while attempting to leave Singapore with a boatman at about 8.47am. When intercepted, the younger Chew claimed that he was out on a fishing trip, TODAY understands. He was charged in court on Thursday for attempting to leave Singapore from Pulau Ubin jetty, an unauthorised point of departure, without reasonable cause. If convicted, Chew could be jailed for up to six months and fined up to S$2,000. He had earlier been sentenced to three years and four months in jail for criminal breach of trust and falsification of accounts in connection with the CHC case, and was due to start his jail term on Thursday. continue reading here : https://www.todayonline.com/singapor...ed-police-bail
__________________
A good government strives to make its citizens' lives better and not make it harder . Ignore list : rocket_boy is a COWARD rocket_boy is now Zapzaplah aka zaplamparlarzap warboi Craz78 Blacklist bros who I up but never return Evetan86 sbftiankon Wally888 |
#185
|
||||
|
||||
Re: What Are Your Predictions for City Harvest Case? Guilty or Not?
Minister K Shanmugam says nope, City Harvest Kongvicts don’t qualify for home detention
But it's ultimately the Commissioner of Prisons's call. By Jeanette Tan | 10 hours Just when we thought the City Harvest Church funds misappropriation case had come to a close with the Court of Appeal’s landmark decision to keep their sentences shortened, the case popped up again in Parliament on Monday and Tuesday this week. It stemmed from a parliamentary question filed by Bukit Batok MP Murali Pillai, arising from something quite technical, but which the whole of Singapore more or less came to understand about our law: section 406 and 409 of the Penal Code. What is it? Those numbers may not immediately make sense to you, but the mention of “City Harvest” might bring everything back to mind. Sections 406 and 409 are two severity levels of the offence of Criminal Breach of Trust — the law under which Kong Hee, Serina Wee and their four counterparts (including the one who tried to escape on a sampan) were convicted of after they misappropriated S$24 million in the church’s building funds to fuel Sun Ho’s music career, and then used another S$26 million to cover the first missing S$24 million. In the end, the Court of Appeal decided that the six convicts’s crimes fell under the less-severe Section 406 of the law. Here’s a more in-depth explainer on why that happened: And this, in turn, led to Law Minister K Shanmugam more or less declaring that they would work toward changing the law: He said then: “It is now up to Parliament to amend the law, and that we should do soon. We will ensure that legislation provides for higher penalties for directors and other senior officers who commit criminal breaches of trust. We hope to make the amendment together with other wide ranging amendments to the Penal Code, which I have spoken about them.” continue reading here : https://mothership.sg/2018/03/minist...ome-detention/ Don't know why someone need to bring this up in parliament ? Wasting taxpayer's money and time .
__________________
A good government strives to make its citizens' lives better and not make it harder . Ignore list : rocket_boy is a COWARD rocket_boy is now Zapzaplah aka zaplamparlarzap warboi Craz78 Blacklist bros who I up but never return Evetan86 sbftiankon Wally888 |
#186
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What Are Your Predictions for City Harvest Case? Guilty or Not?
The MP too dam free.
|
#187
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What Are Your Predictions for City Harvest Case? Guilty or Not?
knn waste taxpayer money debat usuless stuff n just kow how to hamtam ahptc... knn amktc tio taiji all keep quiet.... knnbccb
|
#188
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What Are Your Predictions for City Harvest Case? Guilty or Not?
That is why we need to vote more opposition MPs into parliament. Really double standard .
|
#189
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What Are Your Predictions for City Harvest Case? Guilty or Not?
Yes , we need to do that .
|
#190
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What Are Your Predictions for City Harvest Case? Guilty or Not?
|
#191
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What Are Your Predictions for City Harvest Case? Guilty or Not?
|
#192
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What Are Your Predictions for City Harvest Case? Guilty or Not?
|
#193
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What Are Your Predictions for City Harvest Case? Guilty or Not?
|
#194
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What Are Your Predictions for City Harvest Case? Guilty or Not?
|
#195
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What Are Your Predictions for City Harvest Case? Guilty or Not?
|
Advert Space Available |
Bookmarks |
|
|