The Asian Commercial Sex Scene  

Go Back   The Asian Commercial Sex Scene > For stuff you can't discuss with your Facebook Account > The Legal Geylang (prostitute) Scene

Notices

The Legal Geylang (prostitute) Scene Had a great time with a government approved broad in Geylang? Tell us all about it! No FREELANCE crap here please. Legal commercial sex only. Threads about illegal Geylang whores carry a reputation point penalty.

SG Relax! Image
We Never urge the Guest and we Never use Fake Photos

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #211  
Old 21-09-2017, 12:17 PM
max_priest's Avatar
max_priest max_priest is offline
Samster
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Burj Al Arab
Posts: 8,333
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1376 Post(s)
My Reputation: Points: 20960 / Power: 25
max_priest has a reputation beyond reputemax_priest has a reputation beyond reputemax_priest has a reputation beyond reputemax_priest has a reputation beyond reputemax_priest has a reputation beyond reputemax_priest has a reputation beyond reputemax_priest has a reputation beyond reputemax_priest has a reputation beyond reputemax_priest has a reputation beyond reputemax_priest has a reputation beyond reputemax_priest has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Sharing info for tall WLs

Thanks for the reminder, Mr Botak .... and it goes to show my bombardment is working on you as you are affected dramatically. That's why I said you are not in my league as you are too straight forward and naive in addition to being stupid.

And you have conveniently left out the bold sentence of the below jabwernet's post ... you are shooting your own leg by repeating this quote here. That's why I said you are one bloody stupid member I have ever come across in my decade in SBF.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jabwemet View Post
Don't you find it tiresome repeating the same comments over and over again. I only read the last few verses of your online arguement and it's already boring.
If you can't be funny please take ur issues offline. Nobody's entertained and your value to this thread is not appreciated. This is to the both of you. It's 2017. Forum trolling is so 2007. Move on.

In fact the I remember the Delphi forums day had something similar btwn trussardi and someone samster.. all big canon.. haolian got money and big dick.. in the end another samster sexpose them.. turned out to be 2 married men with kids who were not what they claimed they were!

It doesn't matter what people claim they are online. It really doesn't. If u think someone is not telling the truth. Just # it with '#fakenews' and move on.
The other stuff is uneccesary waste of bandwidth .

Thank you and have a good day!

Quote:
Originally Posted by baotohk View Post
Don't keep repeating the same thing. You are becoming a laughing stock. In case you are blind . Here's the quote for you


https://www.sammyboyforum.com/showpost.php?p=16451954&postcount=959
__________________
There's a dark side to male sexuality that operates on an intrinsically primitive level. Unleash it and you can't help but see evidence of raw, uncontrollable emotion ...

My Personal FR Thread:

Last edited by max_priest; 21-09-2017 at 12:30 PM.
  #212  
Old 21-09-2017, 01:45 PM
baotohk baotohk is offline
Samster
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,751
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My Reputation: Points: 1896 / Power: 13
baotohk has a brilliant futurebaotohk has a brilliant futurebaotohk has a brilliant futurebaotohk has a brilliant futurebaotohk has a brilliant futurebaotohk has a brilliant futurebaotohk has a brilliant futurebaotohk has a brilliant futurebaotohk has a brilliant futurebaotohk has a brilliant futurebaotohk has a brilliant future
Re: Sharing info for tall WLs

Quote:
Originally Posted by max_priest View Post
Thanks for the reminder, Mr Botak .... and it goes to show my bombardment is working on you as you are affected dramatically. That's why I said you are not in my league as you are too straight forward and naive in addition to being stupid.

And you have conveniently left out the bold sentence of the below jabwernet's post ... you are shooting your own leg by repeating this quote here. That's why I said you are one bloody stupid member I have ever come across in my decade in SBF.
I post the link for others to read. Self explanatory.

I'm not surprised by your interpretation.... your intellectual level speaks volume.

Do you get arm sore after repeatedly patting your own shoulder ? Maybe not, you have good genes ....shameless ones
__________________
***Speak the truth and only the truth can set you free.***
  #213  
Old 21-09-2017, 02:28 PM
besafe besafe is offline
Samster
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: No Where
Posts: 3,354
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My Reputation: Points: 1061 / Power: 16
besafe has much to be proud ofbesafe has much to be proud ofbesafe has much to be proud ofbesafe has much to be proud ofbesafe has much to be proud ofbesafe has much to be proud ofbesafe has much to be proud ofbesafe has much to be proud of
Re: Sharing info for tall WLs

Dun leh. Many of us are going bald. mistaken for esteem Brother, how?

Last edited by besafe; 21-09-2017 at 02:29 PM. Reason: Edit
  #214  
Old 21-09-2017, 02:59 PM
max_priest's Avatar
max_priest max_priest is offline
Samster
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Burj Al Arab
Posts: 8,333
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1376 Post(s)
My Reputation: Points: 20960 / Power: 25
max_priest has a reputation beyond reputemax_priest has a reputation beyond reputemax_priest has a reputation beyond reputemax_priest has a reputation beyond reputemax_priest has a reputation beyond reputemax_priest has a reputation beyond reputemax_priest has a reputation beyond reputemax_priest has a reputation beyond reputemax_priest has a reputation beyond reputemax_priest has a reputation beyond reputemax_priest has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Sharing info for tall WLs

hey Mr Botak, trying to cover up your mistake?! Your stupidity and foolhardiness have once again betrayed u. Didn't I told u to engage your clutch before u shift gear? LOL!

Quote:
Originally Posted by baotohk View Post
I post the link for others to read. Self explanatory.

I'm not surprised by your interpretation.... your intellectual level speaks volume.

Do you get arm sore after repeatedly patting your own shoulder ? Maybe not, you have good genes ....shameless ones
__________________
There's a dark side to male sexuality that operates on an intrinsically primitive level. Unleash it and you can't help but see evidence of raw, uncontrollable emotion ...

My Personal FR Thread:
  #215  
Old 21-09-2017, 03:01 PM
max_priest's Avatar
max_priest max_priest is offline
Samster
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Burj Al Arab
Posts: 8,333
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1376 Post(s)
My Reputation: Points: 20960 / Power: 25
max_priest has a reputation beyond reputemax_priest has a reputation beyond reputemax_priest has a reputation beyond reputemax_priest has a reputation beyond reputemax_priest has a reputation beyond reputemax_priest has a reputation beyond reputemax_priest has a reputation beyond reputemax_priest has a reputation beyond reputemax_priest has a reputation beyond reputemax_priest has a reputation beyond reputemax_priest has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Sharing info for tall WLs

Quote:
Originally Posted by besafe View Post
Dun leh. Many of us are going bald. mistaken for esteem Brother, how?
You wouldn't mistaken Mr Botak aka Baotohk for anybody ... He is an "unique" one who shits & masturbates in a kennel.
__________________
There's a dark side to male sexuality that operates on an intrinsically primitive level. Unleash it and you can't help but see evidence of raw, uncontrollable emotion ...

My Personal FR Thread:
  #216  
Old 21-09-2017, 05:05 PM
ejectjoy ejectjoy is offline
Samster
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 2,313
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quoted: 595 Post(s)
My Reputation: Points: 24342 / Power: 18
ejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Sharing info for tall WLs

I hope there has been enough "artillery shelling" between MP and baotohk in this thread. It's time to terminate here and bring it elsewhere.

Just rtf Mitchelle of 1612. A terrible choice by me. She did give me gd lip-locking kissing the first time round. I thought she will improve somewhat after several months. Absolutely no improvement! In fact, it was somewhat worse ... a bad outing for me! OKT said 3 new WLs will come in about 3 wks, one of them a slim tallie. Looking fwd to that! Hopefully, she will not be like Mitchelle.
  #217  
Old 21-09-2017, 05:22 PM
BronzeGod BronzeGod is offline
Samster
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,795
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
My Reputation: Points: 2105 / Power: 20
BronzeGod has a reputation beyond reputeBronzeGod has a reputation beyond reputeBronzeGod has a reputation beyond reputeBronzeGod has a reputation beyond reputeBronzeGod has a reputation beyond reputeBronzeGod has a reputation beyond reputeBronzeGod has a reputation beyond reputeBronzeGod has a reputation beyond reputeBronzeGod has a reputation beyond reputeBronzeGod has a reputation beyond reputeBronzeGod has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Sharing info for tall WLs

Quote:
Originally Posted by ejectjoy View Post
I hope there has been enough "artillery shelling" between MP and baotohk in this thread. It's time to terminate here and bring it elsewhere.

Just rtf Mitchelle of 1612. A terrible choice by me. She did give me gd lip-locking kissing the first time round. I thought she will improve somewhat after several months. Absolutely no improvement! In fact, it was somewhat worse ... a bad outing for me! OKT said 3 new WLs will come in about 3 wks, one of them a slim tallie. Looking fwd to that! Hopefully, she will not be like Mitchelle.
To be honest, the "shelling" between max and baotohk is considered mild compared to some of the serious and much more sinister attacks we've seen over the years. I say just let them continue having fun as it doesn't involve us neither did it stop us from sharing.

The only thing I will say NO to is when people play with others REAL lives or betraying trust by revealing private messages shared in confidence just to win some online argument or to chase detractors out.

Open sharing means anyone and everyone can give their opinion, but it shouldn't become like some personal vendetta against samsters that one disagrees with. Just my opinion.
  #218  
Old 21-09-2017, 05:37 PM
ejectjoy ejectjoy is offline
Samster
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 2,313
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quoted: 595 Post(s)
My Reputation: Points: 24342 / Power: 18
ejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond repute
Wink Re: Sharing info for tall WLs

Quote:
Originally Posted by BronzeGod View Post
To be honest, the "shelling" between max and baotohk is considered mild compared to some of the serious and much more sinister attacks we've seen over the years. I say just let them continue having fun as it doesn't involve us neither did it stop us from sharing.

The only thing I will say NO to is when people play with others REAL lives or betraying trust by revealing private messages shared in confidence just to win some online argument or to chase detractors out.

Open sharing means anyone and everyone can give their opinion, but it shouldn't become like some personal vendetta against samsters that one disagrees with. Just my opinion.
For myself, being a more peaceloving samster, the noise from the "shelling" is not so tolerable. But anyway, I shall try to increase my tolerance level Anyway, it is not up to me to say. Only Boss can show his Trump power ...
  #219  
Old 21-09-2017, 09:23 PM
joker88's Avatar
joker88 joker88 is offline
Samster
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 2,815
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 105 Post(s)
My Reputation: Points: 5241 / Power: 19
joker88 has a reputation beyond reputejoker88 has a reputation beyond reputejoker88 has a reputation beyond reputejoker88 has a reputation beyond reputejoker88 has a reputation beyond reputejoker88 has a reputation beyond reputejoker88 has a reputation beyond reputejoker88 has a reputation beyond reputejoker88 has a reputation beyond reputejoker88 has a reputation beyond reputejoker88 has a reputation beyond repute
Smile Re: Sharing info for tall WLs

Quote:
Originally Posted by max_priest View Post
Apology bro as I didn't bring along a measuring tape to measure her (BG to note) ...............
Quote:
Originally Posted by ejectjoy View Post
I also don't bring a measuring tape. A 1-ft long ruler may be more useful since the WLs invariably admire my dick

MP, you are too easily disillusioned by the body length of 1606 WLs. You are NOT the only one though. Someone thought MaLi could fit in the cat150 tall gal category!
You can use your eyes as a guide. No need measuring tape.

If you look straight and her eyes are in line with your eyes then she is the approx same height as you lor.

If you look straight and her eyes is 2cm below yours then she is approx 2cm below you lor.

I am 1.69m tall. If she is 1.68m or 1.67m or below, I can tell easily liao.
Ting Ting is same height as me.
Baby and Michelle taller than me.

Gals that I tried and my estimate below.

1.70m - Baby (1608), Michelle (1612)
1.69m - Ting Ting (1669)
1.68m - Meng Lu (1606), Xiao Yu (2036), Qian Qian (2831A), Nian Nian (2036)
1.67m - Xiao Ai (2060), Jia Fei (1617)
1.66m - Mei You (2033)
1.65m - Hui Min (W06), Tina (1667), Zhi Zhi (1606), Co Co (1608), Xiang Xiang (1606)

Others I tried all below 1.65m.

Error tolerance is +/- 1cm.
I stand corrected.

Xiao Yu, Qian Qian, Nian Nian, Zhi Zhi no frenching.

Disclaimer: Please dun bring a measuring tape to measure then fire me hor.
__________________
Up Queue: ??

Please PM me if I had missed you out.
  #220  
Old 21-09-2017, 09:53 PM
joker88's Avatar
joker88 joker88 is offline
Samster
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 2,815
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 105 Post(s)
My Reputation: Points: 5241 / Power: 19
joker88 has a reputation beyond reputejoker88 has a reputation beyond reputejoker88 has a reputation beyond reputejoker88 has a reputation beyond reputejoker88 has a reputation beyond reputejoker88 has a reputation beyond reputejoker88 has a reputation beyond reputejoker88 has a reputation beyond reputejoker88 has a reputation beyond reputejoker88 has a reputation beyond reputejoker88 has a reputation beyond repute
Smile Re: Sharing info for tall WLs

Bros

Can we stop the shelling and get back to our serious biz of

SHARING INFO FOR TALL WLs.

I think bonking WLs is more fun then shelling lah.
__________________
Up Queue: ??

Please PM me if I had missed you out.
  #221  
Old 21-09-2017, 10:10 PM
unfit's Avatar
unfit unfit is offline
Samster
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: east
Posts: 14,181
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1596 Post(s)
My Reputation: Points: 15223 / Power: 27
unfit has a reputation beyond reputeunfit has a reputation beyond reputeunfit has a reputation beyond reputeunfit has a reputation beyond reputeunfit has a reputation beyond reputeunfit has a reputation beyond reputeunfit has a reputation beyond reputeunfit has a reputation beyond reputeunfit has a reputation beyond reputeunfit has a reputation beyond reputeunfit has a reputation beyond repute
Lightbulb Re: Sharing info for tall WLs

Quote:
Originally Posted by joker88 View Post
You can use your eyes as a guide. No need measuring tape.

If you look straight and her eyes are in line with your eyes then she is the approx same height as you lor. :

If you look straight and her eyes is 2cm below yours then she is approx 2cm below you lor.

I am 1.69m tall. If she is 1.68m or 1.67m or below, I can tell easily liao.
Ting Ting is same height as me.
Baby and Michelle taller than me.

Gals that I tried and my estimate below. :

1.70m - Baby (1608), Michelle (1612)
1.69m - Ting Ting (1669)
1.68m - Meng Lu (1606), Xiao Yu (2036), Qian Qian (2831A), Nian Nian (2036)
1.67m - Xiao Ai (2060), Jia Fei (1617)
1.66m - Mei You (2033)
1.65m - Hui Min (W06), Tina (1667), Zhi Zhi (1606), Co Co (1608), Xiang Xiang (1606)

Others I tried all below 1.65m.

Error tolerance is +/- 1cm. :
I stand corrected.

Xiao Yu, Qian Qian, Nian Nian, Zhi Zhi no frenching.

Disclaimer: Please dun bring a measuring tape to measure then fire me hor. :
Hello Joker...you sure XX got 1.65m

Dont need measuring tape also can tell she is much shorter than that leh

You got Cock Eye Bo Huh
__________________
whoremongers never die cos they just reunite in hell
  #222  
Old 21-09-2017, 10:11 PM
Samurai69 Samurai69 is offline
Samster
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 91
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My Reputation: Points: 71 / Power: 7
Samurai69 deserves a Tiger! - He's a Good Guy
Quote:
Originally Posted by joker88 View Post
You can use your eyes as a guide. No need measuring tape.

If you look straight and her eyes are in line with your eyes then she is the approx same height as you lor.

If you look straight and her eyes is 2cm below yours then she is approx 2cm below you lor.

I am 1.69m tall. If she is 1.68m or 1.67m or below, I can tell easily liao.
Ting Ting is same height as me.
Baby and Michelle taller than me.

Gals that I tried and my estimate below.

1.70m - Baby (1608), Michelle (1612)
1.69m - Ting Ting (1669)
1.68m - Meng Lu (1606), Xiao Yu (2036), Qian Qian (2831A), Nian Nian (2036)
1.67m - Xiao Ai (2060), Jia Fei (1617)
1.66m - Mei You (2033)
1.65m - Hui Min (W06), Tina (1667), Zhi Zhi (1606), Co Co (1608), Xiang Xiang (1606)

Others I tried all below 1.65m.

Error tolerance is +/- 1cm.
I stand corrected.

Xiao Yu, Qian Qian, Nian Nian, Zhi Zhi no frenching.

Disclaimer: Please dun bring a measuring tape to measure then fire me hor.
Sorry, pardon me to ask what the relationship between height and sextisfaction? 160cm man and 169cm WL, if lie down together on the bed, height play no difference. Only if use Standing style than got issue.
  #223  
Old 21-09-2017, 10:17 PM
ejectjoy ejectjoy is offline
Samster
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 2,313
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quoted: 595 Post(s)
My Reputation: Points: 24342 / Power: 18
ejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Sharing info for tall WLs

Quote:
Originally Posted by joker88 View Post
Gals that I tried and my estimate below.

1.70m - Baby (1608), Michelle (1612)
1.69m - Ting Ting (1669)
1.68m - Meng Lu (1606), Xiao Yu (2036), Qian Qian (2831A), Nian Nian (2036)
1.67m - Xiao Ai (2060), Jia Fei (1617)
1.66m - Mei You (2033)
1.65m - Hui Min (W06), Tina (1667), Zhi Zhi (1606), Co Co (1608), Xiang Xiang (1606)

Others I tried all below 1.65m.

Error tolerance is +/- 1cm.
I stand corrected.

Xiao Yu, Qian Qian, Nian Nian, Zhi Zhi no frenching.
Must say that you have provided the most accurate estimates, in line with my listing.

Actually, from my toes to a part of the face is 1.65m. Thus, I can distinguish who are at 1.65m and those who are taller/shorter. So, BG correctly hinted that someone always carry a measuring tape with him

You can add Michelle to the no frenching list.
  #224  
Old 21-09-2017, 10:26 PM
BronzeGod BronzeGod is offline
Samster
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,795
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
My Reputation: Points: 2105 / Power: 20
BronzeGod has a reputation beyond reputeBronzeGod has a reputation beyond reputeBronzeGod has a reputation beyond reputeBronzeGod has a reputation beyond reputeBronzeGod has a reputation beyond reputeBronzeGod has a reputation beyond reputeBronzeGod has a reputation beyond reputeBronzeGod has a reputation beyond reputeBronzeGod has a reputation beyond reputeBronzeGod has a reputation beyond reputeBronzeGod has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Sharing info for tall WLs

Quote:
Originally Posted by joker88 View Post
Bros

Can we stop the shelling and get back to our serious biz of

SHARING INFO FOR TALL WLs.

I think bonking WLs is more fun then shelling lah.
Normal bro. Since those alejandro88 days with thegreenlantern, royal.chimp and king.cobra. There are other nicks that no longer appear here that were also bullying others...

More of us should've spoken up then. But many just kept quiet and that's why we are here in this state today where "open sharing" has died down.

Now a bit too late to cry over spilt semen
  #225  
Old 21-09-2017, 10:27 PM
ejectjoy ejectjoy is offline
Samster
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 2,313
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quoted: 595 Post(s)
My Reputation: Points: 24342 / Power: 18
ejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond reputeejectjoy has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Sharing info for tall WLs

The current tall WL for cat150 listing remains as follows:

1. Jia Fei (1.67m) - 1617
2. Xiao Ai (1.66m) - 2060
3. Meng Lu (1.68m) - 1606
4. Xiao Qi (1.68m) - 2045
5. Mei You (1.66m) - 2033
6. Michelle (1.70m) - 1612, no french
7. Baby (1.71m) - 1608
8. Ting Ting (1.69m) - 1669
9. Nian Nian (1.68m) - 2036, no french
10. Xiao Yu (1.68m) - 2036 , untested, no french
11. Qian Qian (1.68m) - 2831A , untested, no french

Those at 1.65m include
Zhi Zhi (1606)
Xiang Xiang (1606) ?? not tried; so not verified; seems a bit shorter?
Co Co (1608)
Tina (1667)
Hui Min (16W06)
Xiao Ping (2040)
Yue Tian (2062a) ?? still ard or alrdy rtc?

Last edited by ejectjoy; 21-09-2017 at 10:40 PM.
Advert Space Available
Bypass censorship with https://1.1.1.1

Cloudflare 1.1.1.1
Reply



Bookmarks

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


t Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Are you cautious when sharing info with colleagues? MobileSuits Matters of the Heart. 15 27-02-2016 08:15 AM
All bros sharing info for bbbj ahzai88 The Legal Geylang (prostitute) Scene 9 03-12-2011 11:51 AM
Some Info for sharing - I tried my luck at C81 torrokey Health Centre and KTV lounge Tangos 8 28-06-2010 04:01 PM
Hatyai Before & After Dark :- Info-sharing & FRs KatoeyLover69 The best of Thailand 241 07-11-2007 02:31 AM


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 07:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copywrong © Samuel Leong 2006 ~ 2023 ph